In the Reproducibility Project, effects that were successfully replicated were generally smaller or weaker than the effects reported in the original studies.
Sources
- A reproducibility crisis? - American Psychological Association (apa.org)
- https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aac4716 (science.org)
- https://www.bps.org.uk/research-digest/what-happened-when-psychologists-tried-replicate-100-previously-published-findings (bps.org.uk)
- https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13428-017-0967-6 (link.springer.com)
More in Psychology
- A study published in Nature Communications found that participants could easily predict when a single ball would hit the ground after disappearing from view, but struggled to track two invisible balls simultaneously.
- Robert J. Vallerand received the William James Award from APA for his 2015 book The Psychology of Passion.
- In Greene and Paxton's coin-flip prediction study, 14 of 35 participants were classified as 'dishonest' because they achieved an improbable average accuracy of 69% or higher.
- In McCabe's five-year follow-up study, only about 25 percent of friends from college remained friends in participants' after-college networks.
- A follow-up investigation comprising five related experiments failed to find an effect of signing at the beginning of a form on dishonesty.
- In a study by Dacher Keltner and his team, people could generally convey and interpret emotion through a brief touch, except when women conveyed anger to men and when men conveyed sympathy to women.